Re: Questions about the hash function transition

From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Aug 24, 2018, 04:47 UTC
Message-ID: <20180824044720.GG535143@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180824015438.GF99542@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:54:38PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> brian m. carlson wrote:
> > I realize I have a lot of code that has not been sent in yet, but I also
> > tend to build on my own series a lot, and I probably need to be a bit
> > better about extracting reusable pieces that can go in independently
> > without waiting for the previous series to land.
> 
> For what it's worth, even if it all is in one commit with message
> "wip", I think I'd benefit from being able to see this code.  I can
> promise not to critique it, and to only treat it as a rough
> premonition of the future.

It's in my object-id-partn branch at https://github.com/bk2204/git.

It doesn't do protocol v2 yet, but it does do protocol v1. It is, of course, subject to change (especially naming) depending on what the list thinks is most appropriate.

-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204