Re: [PATCH 1/2] config: document git config getter return value.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2018, 03:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180803032948.GG197924@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180802121308.17371-2-hanwen@google.com>
(cc-ing peff, config whiz) Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Subject: config: document git config getter return value.
micronit: no period at the end of subject line
> --- > config.h | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
May we forge your sign-off? See Documentation/SubmittingPatches section [[sign-off]] for what this means.
Show 12 quoted lines
>
> diff --git a/config.h b/config.h
> index b95bb7649..41700f40b 100644
> --- a/config.h
> +++ b/config.h
> @@ -178,10 +178,16 @@ struct config_set {
> };
>
> extern void git_configset_init(struct config_set *cs);
> -extern int git_configset_add_file(struct config_set *cs, const char *filename);
> -extern int git_configset_get_value(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char **value);
> +nit: this blank line feels out of place (though I don't particularly mind it and wouldn't reroll just for that)
Show 8 quoted lines
> extern const struct string_list *git_configset_get_value_multi(struct config_set *cs, const char *key); > extern void git_configset_clear(struct config_set *cs); > + > +/* > + * These functions return 1 if not found, and 0 if found, leaving the found > + * value in the 'dest' pointer. > + */ > +extern int git_configset_add_file(struct config_set *cs, const char *filename);
This function doesn't take a 'dest' argument. Is the comment meant to apply to it? If not, can the comment go below it?
> +extern int git_configset_get_value(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char **dest); > extern int git_configset_get_string_const(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char **dest); > extern int git_configset_get_string(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, char **dest); > extern int git_configset_get_int(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, int *dest);
With a sign-off and whatever subset of the above suggestions makes sense to you,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Thanks.