Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] grep.c: teach --only-matching to 'git-grep(1)'
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2018, 20:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180706201522.GA657@syl.attlocal.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqlgaokyy5.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 11:21:06AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes: > > > I think that this might be clear enough on its own, especially since > > this is the same as BSD grep on my machine. I think that part_s_ of a > > line indicates that behavior, but perhaps not. On GNU grep, this is: > > > > Print only the matched (non-empty) parts of a matching line, with each > > such part on a separate output line. > > Interesting. I wonder what "git grep -o '^'" would do ;-)
That invocation prints nothing, but on BSD grep it prints quite a few blank lines :-).
I'm hesitant on sending a patch per the hunk of your reply below because of this. Should we mirror BSD grep's behavior exactly here? I suppose that we could somehow, but it seems like we might be doing too much to support what appears to me to be an odd use-case.
Show 9 quoted lines
> > I'm happy to pick either and re-send this patch (2/2) again, if it > > wouldn't be too much to juggle. Otherwise, I can re-roll to v4. > > Please do not re-send a different version of a patch with the same > v$n value. Either re-send, otherwise re-roll, will give us v4, not > v3. > > In any case, I find that the GNU phrasing is the most clear among > the ones I've seen in this thread so far.
OK. I'm happy to re-send that patch with the GNU phrasing depending on what others think (and the above). I'll let this cook and collect some thoughts over the weekend.
Thanks, Taylor