Re: GDPR compliance best practices?
- From
- Peter Backes <rtc@helen.plasma.xg8.de>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2018, 12:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180608120320.GB12013@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE>
- In-Reply-To
- <8736xxzof3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:13:20AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Can you walk us through how anyone would be expected to fork (as create > a new project, not the github-ism) existing projects under such a > regiment?
I don't see your point. Copy the repository to fork. Nothing changes about that. Nothing prevents anyone from forking a repository which had some of its author names removed from the commits.
> As David Lang notes upthread, "the license is granted to the world, so > the world has an interest in it". I wouldn't be so sure that this line > of argument wouldn't work.
As I already stressed, having an interest is not enough. You need to have overriding legitimate grounds.
Best wishes Peter
-- Peter Backes, rtc@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE