Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] json-writer: t0019: add Python unit test
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2018, 02:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180607022353.GA3898@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <a50f4a76-7534-b036-e1a4-5560178bd044@ramsayjones.plus.com>
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:16:14AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> > Probably. We may want to go the same route as we did for perl in > > a0e0ec9f7d (t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH, > > 2013-10-28) so that test writers don't have to remember this. > > > > That said, I wonder if it would be hard to simply do the python bits > > here in perl. This is the first use of python in our test scripts (and > > Hmm, not quite the _first_ use: > > $ git grep PYTHON_PATH -- t > t/lib-git-p4.sh: (cd / && "$PYTHON_PATH" -c 'import time; print(int(time.time()))') > t/lib-git-p4.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/marshal-dump.py" > t/t9020-remote-svn.sh:export PATH PYTHON_PATH GIT_BUILD_DIR > t/t9020-remote-svn.sh:exec "$PYTHON_PATH" "$GIT_BUILD_DIR/contrib/svn-fe/svnrdump_sim.py" "$@" > t/t9802-git-p4-filetype.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/k_smush.py" <"$cli/k-text-k" >cli-k-text-k-smush && > t/t9802-git-p4-filetype.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/ko_smush.py" <"$cli/k-text-ko" >cli-k-text-ko-smush && > t/t9802-git-p4-filetype.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/gendouble.py" >%double.png && > t/t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/scrub_k.py" <"$git/$file" >"$scrub" && > t/t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh: "$PYTHON_PATH" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/scrub_ko.py" <"$git/$file" >"$scrub" && > $
OK, the first for a feature that is not already written in python (leading into my second claim that python is used only for fringe commands ;) ).
Though maybe I am wrong that the remote-svn stuff requires python. I thought it did, but poking around, it looks like it's all C, and just the "svnrdump_sim" helper is python.
At any rate, I think the point still stands that perl is our main scripting language. I'd rather keep us to that unless there's a good reason not to.
-Peff