Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] merge-recursive: fix assumption that head tree being merged is HEAD
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 02:52:12PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On 03/06/18 07:58, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > I'm really unsure where the index_has_changes() declaration should go;
> > I stuck it in tree.h, but is there a better spot?
>
> Err, leave it where it is and '#include "tree.h"' ? :-D
Or leave it where it is and use a forward structure declaration?
--
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204