Re: upstreaming https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag ?
- From
Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2018, 20:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180108205138.jak7ahdppotgcckz@LykOS.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <1515444153.3249266.1228432904.51A92479@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Yeah, I see where you're coming from. I don't think push certificates have caught on yet...
You can read on them on [1], and also under the Documentation/git-push:147.
There's also another PR trying to make a sample hook for signed pushes on [2].
The basic idea is to push a signed data structure with relevant git reference information as a git object to avoid a server/mitm from moving references around.
Cheers! -Santiago.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/1408485987-3590-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com/ [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/20171202091248.6037-1-root@shikherverma.com/
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:42:33PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Santiago Torres wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I personally like the idea of git-evtags, but I feel that they could be > > made so that push certificates (and being hash-algorithm agnostic) > > should provide the same functionality with less code. > > What's a "push certificate"? (I really tried to find it in Google, > even going to page 4 where one can start to see tumbleweeds > going by... I'm fairly certain you're not talking about something related > to iOS notifications)