Re: [PATCH] cherry-pick: add --keep-existing-origin option
- From
Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2017, 14:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20171028142120.GA12833@alpha.vpn.ikke.info>
- In-Reply-To
- <20171028120440.2022-1-yp@anthonywong.net>
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 08:04:40PM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote:
Show 93 quoted lines
> When cherry-picking from a commit whose commit message already
> contains the "(cherry picked from commit ...)" line, this option will
> not add another one. This is useful when you are cherry-picking from a
> bunch of commits, some are cherry-picks and already contains the
> upstream hash but some do not. Use with -x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Wong <yp@anthonywong.net>
> ---
> Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt | 8 ++++++++
> builtin/revert.c | 2 ++
> sequencer.c | 14 ++++++++------
> sequencer.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt b/Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt
> index d35d771fc..7a074511f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt
> @@ -71,6 +71,14 @@ OPTIONS
> development branch), adding this information can be
> useful.
>
> +--keep-existing-origin::
> + This option has to be used with -x to take effect. When
> + cherry-picking from a commit whose commit message already
> + contains the "(cherry picked from commit ...)" line, this
> + option will not add another one. This is useful when you are
> + cherry-picking from a bunch of commits, some are cherry-picks
> + and already contains the upstream hash but some do not.
> +
> -r::
> It used to be that the command defaulted to do `-x`
> described above, and `-r` was to disable it. Now the
> diff --git a/builtin/revert.c b/builtin/revert.c
> index b9d927eb0..a1900cc1d 100644
> --- a/builtin/revert.c
> +++ b/builtin/revert.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, struct replay_opts *opts)
> OPT_BOOL(0, "allow-empty", &opts->allow_empty, N_("preserve initially empty commits")),
> OPT_BOOL(0, "allow-empty-message", &opts->allow_empty_message, N_("allow commits with empty messages")),
> OPT_BOOL(0, "keep-redundant-commits", &opts->keep_redundant_commits, N_("keep redundant, empty commits")),
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "keep-existing-origin", &opts->keep_existing_origin, N_("do not add another hash if one already exists, use with -x")),
> OPT_END(),
> };
> options = parse_options_concat(options, cp_extra);
> @@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ static int run_sequencer(int argc, const char **argv, struct replay_opts *opts)
> "--ff", opts->allow_ff,
> "--rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_AUTOUPDATE,
> "--no-rerere-autoupdate", opts->allow_rerere_auto == RERERE_NOAUTOUPDATE,
> + "--keep-existing-origin", opts->keep_existing_origin,
> NULL);
> }
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index f2a10cc4f..c96add16e 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -1050,12 +1050,14 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command, struct commit *commit,
> strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, p);
>
> if (opts->record_origin) {
> - strbuf_complete_line(&msgbuf);
> - if (!has_conforming_footer(&msgbuf, NULL, 0))
> - strbuf_addch(&msgbuf, '\n');
> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, cherry_picked_prefix);
> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid));
> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, ")\n");
> + if (!opts->keep_existing_origin || strstr(msgbuf.buf, cherry_picked_prefix) == NULL) {
> + strbuf_complete_line(&msgbuf);
> + if (!has_conforming_footer(&msgbuf, NULL, 0))
> + strbuf_addch(&msgbuf, '\n');
> + strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, cherry_picked_prefix);
> + strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid));
> + strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, ")\n");
> + }
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.h b/sequencer.h
> index 6f3d3df82..a907c0947 100644
> --- a/sequencer.h
> +++ b/sequencer.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct replay_opts {
> int allow_empty;
> int allow_empty_message;
> int keep_redundant_commits;
> + int keep_existing_origin;
> int verbose;
>
> int mainline;
> --
> 2.14.1
> I'm wondering if it isn't better to detect that there is already an origin present and not add another one.
Or are there situations where you do want multiple cherry-pick origins?
Kevin