Re: Line ending normalization doesn't work as expected

> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> 
> > Before we put this into stone:
> > Does it make sense to say "renormalize" instead of "rehash" ?
> > (That term does exist already for merge.
> >  And rehash is more a technical term,  rather then a user-point-of-view explanation)
> 
> I do not mind "renormalize" at all.
> 
> As to the toy patch, I think it needs to (at least by default) turn
> off the add_new_files codepath, and be allowed to work without any
> pathspec (in which case all tracked paths should be renormalized).
>