[PATCH] branch: reset instead of release a strbuf

From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Oct 3, 2017, 21:14 UTC
Message-ID: <20171003211409.16037-1-sbeller@google.com>

Our documentation advises to not re-use a strbuf, after strbuf_release has been called on it. Use the proper reset instead.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---

Maybe one of the #leftoverbits is to remove the re-init call in release and see what breaks? (And then fixing up more of such cases as presented in this patch)

Thanks, Stefan

 builtin/branch.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index b998e16d0c..9758012390 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char **argv, int force, int kinds,
 		if (!head_rev)
 			die(_("Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD"));
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_release(&bname)) {
+	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_reset(&bname)) {
 		char *target = NULL;
 		int flags = 0;

-- 
2.14.0.rc0.3.g6c2e499285