Re: [WIP/RFC 00/23] repository object
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- May 21, 2017, 16:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170521162816.xio7ttltdrlqmb6m@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170518232134.163059-1-bmwill@google.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:21:11PM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:
> This is still very much in a WIP state, though it does pass all tests. What > I'm hoping for here is to get a discussion started about the feasibility of a > change like this and hopefully to get the ball rolling. Is this a direction we > want to move in? Is it worth the pain?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking at the patches, but I like this idea. I expect that moving in this direction will help us avoid a lot of globals and move us in a direction of more re-entrant code. I can think of a lot of things that could really benefit from this.
-- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204