git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH] name-rev: use larger timestamp for is_better_name

From
EWEric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Date
May 20, 2017, 20:36 UTC
Message-ID
<20170520203649.GA13079@untitled>

This fixes t4202 for me at "44 - log --graph with full output" on 32-bit x86.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
---
 This is for pu, I'm still using the machine I used git with in 2005 :)
 builtin/name-rev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c
index f06498524..35409c03b 100644
--- a/builtin/name-rev.c
+++ b/builtin/name-rev.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static const char *prio_names[] = {
 
 static int is_better_name(struct rev_name *name,
 			  const char *tip_name,
-			  unsigned long taggerdate,
+			  timestamp_t taggerdate,
 			  int generation,
 			  int distance,
 			  int from_tag)
-- 
EW
Next: Ramsay Jones
Message 1 of 3 in “name-rev: use larger timestamp for is_better_name”
  1. name-rev: use larger timestamp for is_better_nameEric Wong, May 20, 2017
  2. Ramsay JonesMay 20, 2017
  3. Junio C HamanoMay 20, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.