Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] Use -y where possible in test t7610-mergetool
- From
Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2017, 21:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170303212150.GA13790@arch-attack.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd1dy880d.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 11:39:30AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> writes: > > > In these tests, there are many situations where > > 'echo "" | git mergetool' is used. This replaces all of those > > occurrences with 'git mergetool -y' for simplicity and readability. > > "-y where _possible_" is not necessarily a good thing to do in > tests. We do want to make sure that both "yes" from the input and > "-y" from the command line work. Changes to "-y" done only for the > tests that are not about accepting the interactive input from the > end-user is a very good idea, but "replaces all of those" makes me > worried.
The 'custom mergetool' test case seems like a good place to introduce an interactive test. Would the following patch to my patch work?
diff --git a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh index b6a419258..71624583c 100755 --- a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh +++ b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh @@ -135,8 +135,8 @@ test_expect_success 'custom mergetool' ' test_expect_code 1 git merge master >/dev/null 2>&1 && git mergetool -y both >/dev/null 2>&1 && git mergetool -y file1 file1 && - git mergetool -y file2 "spaced name" >/dev/null 2>&1 && - git mergetool -y subdir/file3 >/dev/null 2>&1 && + ( yes "" | git mergetool file2 "spaced name" >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && + ( yes "" | git mergetool subdir/file3 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && ( yes "d" | git mergetool file11 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && ( yes "d" | git mergetool file12 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && ( yes "l" | git mergetool submod >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > - ( yes "" | git mergetool file1 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > - ( yes "" | git mergetool file2 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > - ( yes "" | git mergetool "spaced name" >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > - ( yes "" | git mergetool both >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > - ( yes "" | git mergetool subdir/file3 >/dev/null 2>&1 ) && > > + git mergetool file1 >/dev/null 2>&1 && > > + git mergetool file2 >/dev/null 2>&1 && > > + git mergetool "spaced name" >/dev/null 2>&1 && > > + git mergetool both >/dev/null 2>&1 && > > + git mergetool subdir/file3 >/dev/null 2>&1 && > > The reason for the lack of "-y" in the rewrite, in contrast to what > was done in the previous hunk we saw, is not quite obvious. > Sorry, it was my mistake. I had forgotten to replace the '-y'. I have corrected this for a future revision.