Re: "git diff --ignore-space-change --stat" lists files with only whitespace differences as "changed"
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 18, 2017, 21:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170118210821.xugr6jnvzgoxpynb@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvatc3x3r.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:57:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > So I dunno. A sensible rule to me is "iff -p would show a diff header, > > then --stat should mention it". > > True but tricky (you need a better definition of "a diff header"). > > In addition to a new and deleted file, does a file whose executable > bit was flipped need mention? If so, then "diff --git" is the diff > header in the above. Otherwise "@@ ... @@", iow, "iff -p would show > any hunk". > > I think the patch implements the latter, which I think is sensible.
I would think the former is more sensible (and is what my patch is working towards). Doing:
>empty git add empty git diff --cached
shows a "diff --git" header, but no hunk. I think it should show a diffstat (and does with my patch).
I was thinking the rule should be something like:
if (p->status == DIFF_STATUS_MODIFIED &&
!file->added && !file->deleted))and otherwise include the entry, since it would be an add, delete, rename, etc, which carries useful information.
Though a pure rename would not hit this code path at all, I would think (it would not trigger "!same_contents"). And a rename where there was a whitespace only change probably _should_ be omitted from "-b".
Ditto for a pure mode change, I think. We do not run the contents through diff at all, so it does not hit this code path.
-Peff