Re: Rebasing multiple branches at once

> What people seem to do is to teach the branch that ends with F that
> its upstream is the local branch that ends with E, so that they can
> be lazy when rebasing a branch that knows its upstream.  I suspect
> that you would end up with
> 
> A---G---B'--C'--D'--E'--F'
> 
> instead if it is done naively, but if you really care that the
> branch that ends with F does not have E, you presumably want to have
> the branch that ends at D its own identity, so
> 
>  (1) 'master' or whatever that used to end at A and now its tip is
>      at G;
> 
>  (2) the branch that ends at D whose upstream is 'master';
> 
>  (3) the branch that ends at E whose upstream is (2); and
> 
>  (4) the branch that ends at F whose upstream is (2).
> 
> I personally do not do that, though, because you'd need to remember
> the order in which these three branches must be rebased (i.e. (2)
> must be done first before rebasing (3) and (4) in any order).