[PATCHv2] pathspec: give better message for submodule related pathspec error
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Dec 28, 2016, 17:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20161228171746.22859-1-sbeller@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20161228055826.xu2gclwkvisbft6o@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Every once in a while someone complains to the mailing list to have run into this weird assertion[1].
The usual response from the mailing list is link to old discussions[2], and acknowledging the problem stating it is known.
For now just improve the user visible error message.
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=item-%3Enowildcard_len
[2] http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/assert-failed-in-submodule-edge-case-td7628687.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg249473.htmlSigned-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> ---
Peff wrote:
> Don't you need to flip the logic here? An assert() triggers when the > condition is not true, but an "if" does the opposite. So "assert(X)" > should always become "if (!X) die(...)".
Duh! and it should compile as well.
Thanks, Stefan
pathspec.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pathspec.c b/pathspec.c index 22ca74a126..4724d522f2 100644 --- a/pathspec.c +++ b/pathspec.c @@ -313,8 +313,11 @@ static unsigned prefix_pathspec(struct pathspec_item *item, } /* sanity checks, pathspec matchers assume these are sane */ - assert(item->nowildcard_len <= item->len && - item->prefix <= item->len); + if (item->nowildcard_len > item->len || + item->prefix > item->len) + die (_("Path leads inside submodule '%s', but the submodule " + "was not recognized, i.e. not initialized or deleted"), + item->original); return magic; }
-- 2.11.0.196.gee862f456e.dirty