Re: Bug: git config does not respect read-only .gitconfig file
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2016, 03:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20161109033441.hp4eyf5qahimrtr3@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqk2cdbg5v.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:22:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > Probably converting "rename(from, to)" to first check "access(to, > > W_OK)". That's racy, but it's the best we could do. > > Hmph, if these (possibly problematic) callers are all following the > usual "lock, write to temp, rename" pattern, perhaps the lock_file() > function can have access(path, W_OK) check before it returns a > tempfile that has been successfully opened?
Yeah, that is a lot friendlier, as it prevents the caller from doing work (which may even involve the user typing things!) when it is clear that we would fail the final step anyway.
-Peff