Re: [PATCH 2/2] tag: send fully qualified refnames to verify_tag_and_format

> > I think you'd really just squash the various bits of this into your
> > series at the right spots, though I don't mind it on top, either.
> > 
> > The big question is to what degree we should care about the verify-tag
> > case. I don't think it's any worse off with this change than it is with
> > your series (its "kind" becomes "OTHER", but I don't think that is
> > actually used for display at all; the name remains the same). I'd be OK
> > with leaving it like this, as a known bug, until get_sha1_with_context()
> > learns to tell us about the ref. It's an unhandled corner case in a
> > brand-new feature, not a regression in an existing one.
> 
> I see now, I think I can sprinkle some of these changes on 2/7 then. The
> rest should be doing 4/7 and 5/7. Does this sound ok?