Re: Uninitialized submodules as symlinks
- From
Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
- Date
- Oct 13, 2016, 19:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20161013193558.GC1698@ikke.info>
- In-Reply-To
- <20161013161017.GC29710@book.hvoigt.net>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Heiko Voigt wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0000, David Turner wrote: > > Presently, uninitialized submodules are materialized in the working > > tree as empty directories. We would like to consider having them be > > symlinks. Specifically, we'd like them to be symlinks into a FUSE > > filesystem which retrieves files on demand. > > How about portability? This feature would only work on Unix like > operating systems. You have to be careful to not break Windows since > they do not have symlinks. >
NTFS does have symlinks, but you need admin right to create them though (unless you change the policy).