git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016"

From
EWEric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Date
Aug 28, 2016, 09:49 UTC
Message-ID
<20160828094946.GA11722@dcvr>
In-Reply-To
<6d171c23-65f6-5f67-7d80-051f2dfe8678@gmail.com>
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> W dniu 26.08.2016 o 08:15, Eric Wong pisze:
> 
> > Not directly-related to the survey questions, but can you ensure
> > it's accessible to folks without JavaScript/graphics, and
> > perhaps also ensure it is on a host that is Tor-friendly?
> 
> I plan on using Survs.com (where we have Premium account for free,
> thanks to Survs admins).  It has good online analysis tools, allows
> to download results in easy parseable format[1], and has support
> for multiple channels.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/jnareb/GitSurvey-scripts
> 
> 
> It is possible to have a channel without JavaScript and without
> cookies (anonymous), at the cost of having to fill the survey
> in one go (without cookies and JavaScript you cannot go back
> to fill more questions, or change your mind about answers).
> The main page of survey would have a link to JavaScript-free
> version, and all announcements (by me) would include it.
Thanks.
> There would be no graphics that are not purely optional
> (decorative); probably there would be just a logo.
> 
> I'm not sure how Tor-friendly is this host.

I was able to get to Survs.com using Tor (maybe it was just luck with a new exit).

Show 7 quoted lines
> > Graphics setups often require non-Free firmware or drivers for
> > acceptable performance; and there are also visually-impaired
> > users who will need screen readers or Braille.
> 
> A question: would it be better to have the whole survey one one
> large page, or have it split into pages (with fever questions
> per page)?

I prefer single. One could get one page, take take time and let the connection drop/fail, and send it over all in one go. With multiple pages, one would have to reconnect for every POST.

(fittingly, my connection failed writing this message a few
 days ago and I only got back around to it)
Previous: Jakub NarębskiNext: Jakub Narębski
Message 10 of 15 in “[RFC] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016"”
  1. Jakub NarębskiAug 20, 2016
  2. Eric WongAug 20, 2016
  3. Jakub NarębskiAug 25, 2016
  4. Andrew ArdillAug 21, 2016
  5. Jakub NarębskiAug 25, 2016
  6. Andrew ArdillAug 26, 2016
  7. Jakub NarębskiAug 26, 2016
  8. Eric WongAug 26, 2016
  9. Jakub NarębskiAug 26, 2016
  10. Eric WongAug 28, 2016
  11. Jakub NarębskiAug 28, 2016
  12. [RFCv2] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016", take twoJakub Narębski, Aug 27, 2016
  13. [RFCv3] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016", take threeJakub Narębski, Sep 5, 2016
  14. Jakub NarębskiAug 26, 2016
  15. Jakub NarębskiSep 9, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.