Re: [PATCH v2] for-each-ref: add %(upstream:gone) to mark missing refs
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 24, 2016, 18:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160824183358.ahxcgcrg7jo2rygp@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAFaJEqvm9Xj34t+F=KMtwRDEYhwHZ7=MRwsZ22-Gt_UPd4r72A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:26:26PM +0200, Øystein Walle wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> In the mean time, however, I have discovered that this conflicts with > kn/ref-filter-branch-list in pu. In that topic this specific feature is > implemented as well. They incorporate it into %(upstream:track) instead > of having a separate "sub-atom" (what's the correct nomenclature, by the > way?) more in line with with branch -vv and your idea.
Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think it would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. According to the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting on more review. If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a big help.
Thanks.
-Peff