Re: [PATCH 0/3] limit the size of the packs we receive
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 16, 2016, 13:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160816131145.apq77nc2x7wb7lba@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160816081701.29949-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:16:58AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> Changes from previous RFC version > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > - added documentation to all the 3 patches,
Good idea.
Show 5 quoted lines
> - changed strtoul() to strtoumax() in the first 2 patches, as > suggested by Peff, > > - changed git_config_ulong() to git_config_int64() and used PRIuMAX > and uintmax_t in the last patch, as suggested by Peff,
Thinking a bit, off_t is actually signed. So maybe PRIdMAX (which we don't seem to have compat macros for) would make more sense. I dunno if anybody actually cares. This value shouldn't be signed anyway, and nobody should be approaching the limits of a 64-bit number anyway (there is no point in limiting the incoming pack to the exabyte range).
So I'm inclined not to worry about it.
-Peff