Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] receive-pack: allow a maximum input size to be specified
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 15, 2016, 20:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160815204034.rrjn57wigxtjpgye@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160815195729.16826-4-chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:57:29PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > > Receive-pack feeds its input to either index-pack or > unpack-objects, which will happily accept as many bytes as > a sender is willing to provide. Let's allow an arbitrary > cutoff point where we will stop writing bytes to disk. > > What has already been written to disk can be cleaned > outside of receive-pack.
This second paragraph hints at a related problem.
Git is generally happy to leave tmp_pack_* around to be cleaned up later next time git-gc runs. Including its default 2-week grace time.
So imagine that tries to "git push" in a loop. And each time they push, you say "nope, that's too big". And each time you acquire a new 2GB tmp_pack file. If your goal was to prevent somebody from streaming straight to your filesystem and filling up your disk, then it wasn't very successful. :)
The simple fix is to call register_tempfile() in open_pack_file(), and just have index-pack clean up the file on its way out.
But there are harder cases. For instance, imagine somebody pushes a 500MB file, and you have a pre-receive hook that says "too big; I won't accept this". And then they push in a loop, as before. You've accepted the incoming pack into the repository by the time the pre-receive runs. You can't just delete it, because you don't know if other simultaneous processes have started to depend on the objects.
To solve that, I have patches that put incoming packfiles into a "quarantine" area, then run the connectivity check and pre-receive hooks with the quarantine accessible via GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES. And then we either move the quarantine packs into the real repo, or blow away the tmpdir, depending on whether the hooks said the objects were OK.
Those are patches I plan to share upstream but just haven't gotten around to yet.
Show 20 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> index 92e1213..7627f7f 100644
> --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int transfer_unpack_limit = -1;
> static int advertise_atomic_push = 1;
> static int advertise_push_options;
> static int unpack_limit = 100;
> +static off_t max_input_size;
> static int report_status;
> static int use_sideband;
> static int use_atomic;
> @@ -212,6 +213,11 @@ static int receive_pack_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (strcmp(var, "receive.maxsize") == 0) {
> + max_input_size = git_config_ulong(var, value);
> + return 0;
> + }Another off_t/ulong mismatch. I think you want git_config_int64() here.
Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -1650,6 +1656,9 @@ static const char *unpack(int err_fd, struct shallow_info *si) > if (fsck_objects) > argv_array_pushf(&child.args, "--strict%s", > fsck_msg_types.buf); > + if (max_input_size) > + argv_array_pushf(&child.args, "--max-input-size=%lu", > + max_input_size);
And here, PRIuMAX and uintmax_t. Or perhaps simpler, just store the value as a string here and pass it on to index-pack (which would then need to learn to handle suffixes like "2g"). We do a similar trick in repack; see b861e23 (repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings, 2014-01-22).
Show 21 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t5546-push-limits.sh b/t/t5546-push-limits.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..d3a4d1a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/t5546-push-limits.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +test_description='check input limits for pushing' > +. ./test-lib.sh > + > +test_expect_success 'create known-size commit' ' > + test-genrandom foo 1024 >file && > + git add file && > + test_commit one-k > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'create remote repository' ' > + git init --bare dest && > + git --git-dir=dest config receive.unpacklimit 1 > +'
We're going to do basically the same battery of tests against an unpacklimit of "1" (to catch index-pack) and of "10" (to catch unpack-objects). It might be clearer to just have a for-loop like:
for unpacklimit in 1 100 do test_expect_success 'create remote repository' ' rm -rf dest && git init --bare dest && git -C dest config receive.unpacklimit $unpacklimit '
test_expect_success 'receive.maxsize rejects push' ' git -C dest config receive.maxsize 512 && test_must_fail git push dest HEAD && '
test_expect_success 'bumping limit allows push' ' git -C dest config receive.maxsize 4k && git push dest HEAD ' done
and it's probably worth a comment at the top of the loop explaining what the heck those numbers mean. :)
-Peff