Re: [PATCH] pass constants as first argument to st_mult()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2016, 19:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160803194913.cz6xiai3g5r3sghq@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPc5daVABao1UZdPk0BnJNkTtYYV74Tw_0CZ9-uj9sK92h+x7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:41:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:31:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > I think in my head I rewrite any multiplication like "N of M" as having > > "N" as the smaller number. I.e., it is conceptually simpler to me to > > count five 30's, then 30 five's (even though I do not implement it in my > > head as a sequence of additions, of course; I'd probably do that > > particular case as "half of ten 30's"). > > > > I have no idea if that's cultural or not, though. > > Now, when you say "count five 30's", which one do you have > in mind? 5x30, or 30x5? > > If you meant the former, I think that _is_ cultural. I am pretty > sure that I was taught in school(s) to read 5x30 as adding 5 > thirty times.
I think I would say "30x5" in that case. But I'm not sure where that comes from, and I'm not even 100% sure that I would say that (after thinking about it, it's hard for me to figure out what I would have done if I _hadn't_ just thought about it).
-Peff