Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] config: add '--show-origin' option to print the origin of a config value
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2016, 17:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160213174449.GH30144@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1455373456-64691-4-git-send-email-larsxschneider@gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:24:16PM +0100, larsxschneider@gmail.com wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> > > If config values are queried using 'git config' (e.g. via --get, > --get-all, --get-regexp, or --list flag) then it is sometimes hard to > find the configuration file where the values were defined. > > Teach 'git config' the '--show-origin' option to print the source > configuration file for every printed value.
Thanks, I think this version fixes the correctness issues I mentioned earlier. I do still have nits to pick (of course :) ), that we may or may not want to deal with.
Show 7 quoted lines
> +static void show_config_origin(struct strbuf *buf)
> +{
> + const char term = end_null ? '\0' : '\t';
> + const char *type;
> + const char *name;
> +
> + current_config_type_name(&type, &name);This double out-parameter feels like a clunky interface.
I was tempted to suggest that we simply make the "struct config_source" available to builtin/config.c (which is already pretty intimate with the rest of the config code), and then it can pick out what it wants. But there _is_ some logic in the function to convert the NULL "cf" into "cmdline".
Perhaps it would be simpler to just have two accessor functions, and do:
strbuf_addstr(buf, current_config_type()); ... strbuf_addstr(buf, current_config_name());
I admit it is a pretty minor point, though.
Show 8 quoted lines
> static int show_all_config(const char *key_, const char *value_, void *cb)
> {
> + if (show_origin) {
> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> + show_config_origin(&buf);
> + fwrite(buf.buf, 1, buf.len, stdout);
> + strbuf_release(&buf);
> + }The indentation is funky here.
The use of fwrite() to catch the embedded NULs is subtle enough that it might be worth a comment.
It also made me wonder how format_config() handles this. It looks like we send the result eventually to fwrite() there, so it all works (and it does _not_ have the comment I mentioned :) ).
Show 46 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success '--show-origin' ' > + >.git/config && > + >"$HOME"/.gitconfig && > + INCLUDE_DIR="$HOME/include" && > + mkdir -p "$INCLUDE_DIR" && > + cat >"$INCLUDE_DIR"/absolute.include <<-EOF && > + [user] > + absolute = include > + EOF > + cat >"$INCLUDE_DIR"/relative.include <<-EOF && > + [user] > + relative = include > + EOF > + test_config_global user.global "true" && > + test_config_global user.override "global" && > + test_config_global include.path "$INCLUDE_DIR"/absolute.include && > + test_config include.path ../include/relative.include && > + test_config user.local "true" && > + test_config user.override "local" && > + > + cat >expect <<-EOF && > + file:$HOME/.gitconfig user.global=true > + file:$HOME/.gitconfig user.override=global > + file:$HOME/.gitconfig include.path=$INCLUDE_DIR/absolute.include > + file:$INCLUDE_DIR/absolute.include user.absolute=include > + file:.git/config include.path=../include/relative.include > + file:.git/../include/relative.include user.relative=include > + file:.git/config user.local=true > + file:.git/config user.override=local > + cmdline: user.cmdline=true > + EOF > + git -c user.cmdline=true config --list --show-origin >output && > + test_cmp expect output && > + > + cat >expect <<-EOF && > + file:$HOME/.gitconfigQuser.global > + trueQfile:$HOME/.gitconfigQuser.override > + globalQfile:$HOME/.gitconfigQinclude.path > + $INCLUDE_DIR/absolute.includeQfile:$INCLUDE_DIR/absolute.includeQuser.absolute > + includeQfile:.git/configQinclude.path > + ../include/relative.includeQfile:.git/../include/relative.includeQuser.relative > + includeQfile:.git/configQuser.local > + trueQfile:.git/configQuser.override > + localQcmdline:Quser.cmdline > + trueQ > + EOF
I see you split this up more, but there's still quite a bit going on in this one block. IMHO, it would be more customary in our tests to put the setup into one test_expect_success block, then each of these expect-run-cmp blocks into their own test_expect_success.
It does mean that the setup mutates the global test state for further tests (and you should stop using test_config_*, which clean up at the end of the block), but I think that's the right thing here. The point of test_config is "flip on this switch just for a moment, so we can test its effect without hurting further tests". But these are config tests in the first place, and it is OK for them to show a progression of mutations of the config (you'll note that like the other tests in this script, you are clearing out .git/config in the first place).
-Peff