Re: "git stash pop" is doing an unwanted "git add" when there are conflicts.
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2015, 09:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20151222093032.GA5173@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1450772258.7937.9.camel@kaarsemaker.net>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On ma, 2015-12-21 at 14:29 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Hello, git project. > > > > Last night, whilst clearing out a stale "stash stack", I did "git stash > > pop". There were conflicts in two files. > > > > However, all the popped files became staged. This doesn't normally happen. > > It was intensely irritating, and required me to do "git reset HEAD" on > > each of the files, none of which I wanted to commit. > > > > I searched the git-stash man page for this scenario, but found nothing > > about it. > > > > Surely staging all the files is a bug? > > That depends. A stash is two commits: one for all changes that were in > the index when you ran 'git stash save' and one for all changes not yet > in the index. When you pop the stash, these then get restored as staged > resp. unstaged changes. So if your changes are now all staged, I'd > wager that they were staged when you ran git stash save.
No, I think there's something else going on. Try this:
git init repo &&
cd repo &&
echo base >one &&
echo base >two &&
git add . &&
git commit -m base &&
echo stash >one &&
echo stash >two &&
git stash &&
echo "==> No conflicts, nothing staged"
git stash apply &&
git reset --hard &&
echo changes >two &&
git commit -am changes &&
echo "==> Conflict stages non-conflicting file 'one'"
! git stash apply &&
git statusIt seems to be a side effect of merge-recursive to stage the results, and in the no-conflict path we explicitly reset the index. For the conflicting case, it's trickier, because we would want to retain the unmerged entries.
So I agree it's kind of weird, but the conflicting case is inherently going to touch the index, and you'd generally have to `git add` to mark the resolutions (but if you really want to just touch the working tree, you'd need to `git reset`).
-Peff