Re: Replicating the default "git log" format with a format string.

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Nov 13, 2015, 21:52 UTC
Message-ID: <20151113215246.GA14318@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+P7+xro=nNfzO6Q6-kGe6C=vJp-z_svd229kRZdf5QjQ+Di8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:41:23PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> >> Is it possible to exactly replicate the default "git log" format with a
> >> format string?
> >
> > Sadly, no, I don't think it is possible with the current format
> > specifiers. It would be nice if it was, though.
> 
> Isn't this something that might be obtainable using the new ref-filter
> work being done?

It moves in the right direction, but it isn't enough. I don't recall the specifics, but I think it has conditional placeholders for things like "if this is non-empty print it". But there are still some problems:

  - the ref-filter formatting isn't unified with the commit
    pretty-printer formatting. So this wouldn't help for a traversal,
    anyway.

  - the decoration thing needs a new placeholder. "%d" means "always
    show the decoration", but the OP really wants "show the decoration
    if the user asked for decorations, and empty otherwise".

-Peff