Re: Git potential bug with fork-point
- From
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
- Date
- Nov 7, 2015, 16:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20151107160120.GG19802@serenity.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <a3db24afbc3247c3a8466c8d7ce0c785@SEGOTNC5113-N2.vcn.ds.volvo.net>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:27:52AM +0000, Stenberg Jim (2) wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> My problem: > "Git merge-base --fork-point" acts unexpected when I refer to remote > branches (typically "origin/".) With unexpected I mean that if I swap > the position of the two references that the function takes as argument > I get different results. I highly suspect that this isn't a feature > but a bug, or maybe I'm using the function in a way it wasn't intended > to be used. > I don't need you to fix it (swapping the arguments solves it), I just > want you to be aware of it. > > History & procedure: > When I was working on my automatic build script I came across the > oddity that "Git merge-base --fork-point" behaved differently > depending on the order in which the two references are passed.
I think this is expected. The documentation for `--fork-point` says:
git merge-base --fork-point <ref> [<commit>]
Find the point at which a branch (or any history that leads to <commit>) forked from another branch (or any reference) <ref>. This does not just look for the common ancestor of the two commits, but also takes into account the reflog of <ref> to see if the history leading to <commit> forked from an earlier incarnation of the branch <ref> (see discussion on this mode below).
Clearly the order of the arguments matters because the reflog is only inspected for the `<ref>` argument. Since the reflog is involved this also means that the results are likely to be different between separate copies of the same repository.
I suspect you do not want to be using `--fork-point` in your build script; it is intended to help `git rebase` recover from history being rewritten and if you do not need that behaviour you are probably better off using the normal `git merge-base <commit> <commit>` mode, which should give consistent results regardless of the order of the commits.