Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2015, #07; Mon, 27)

From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Jul 30, 2015, 00:29 UTC
Message-ID: <20150730002925.GF809807@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpp3dgurr.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:23:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 16 quoted lines

> * bc/object-id (2015-06-17) 10 commits
>  . remote.c: use struct object_id in many functions
>  . object-id: use struct object_id in struct object
>  . remote.c: use struct object_id in ref_newer()
>  . transport-helper.c: use struct object_id in push_refs_with_export()
>  . connect.c: use struct object_id in get_remote_heads()
>  . remote-curl: use struct object_id in parse_fetch()
>  . fetch-pack: use struct object_id in add_sought_entry_mem()
>  . object_id: convert struct ref to use object_id.
>  . sha1_file: introduce has_object_file() helper
>  . refs: convert some internal functions to use object_id
> 
>  More transition from "unsigned char[40]" to "struct object_id".
> 
>  While GSoC and other topics are actively moving existing code
>  around, this cannot go in; ejected from 'pu'.

Is there anything I can do to make this series less painful (e.g. a reroll or such)? If waiting is the best technique, that's fine; I just want to minimize the impact of this change in terms of other code and maintainer burden.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187