Re: [PATCH 0/3] Raw gpg output support for verify-commit and verify-tag
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:23:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> What this series wants to achieve makes a lot of sense to me. One
> comment I have after skimming the patfches is that I want the new
> "raw" bit added not as a yet another parameter after "verbose", but
> by turning the existing "verbose" into an "unsigned flag" flag word
> (with "#define GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE 01") and then defining use of a
> new bit in the same flag word "#define GPG_VERIFY_RAW 01" or
> something. That way, over time other people add differnt things to
> the interface, we would not have to end up with 47 different
> parameters each of which signals a single bit.
I'll wait for other responses (if any) and then reroll.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>