Re: [PATCH 7/9] strbuf_getwholeline: use getdelim if it is available
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 9, 2015, 01:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150509010952.GA29555@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQi7SfJJc4d3DJ2mJ0-5vT7LJDttPPec=UEsmjiqtLcZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:56:28PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> I spent some time downloading old Xcode releases and poking through > the packages. Xcode 3.2.x seems to be the last in the Xcode 3 series, > and none of the Xcode 3.2.x versions I examined carried getdelim(). > The first package in which I found getdelim() was Xcode 4.1. > (Unfortunately, Apple doesn't seem to make Xcode 4.0 available for > download anymore or it's only available to paying developers, so I > couldn't check it.) According to Wikipedia[1], Xcode 4.1 was released > the same day as Lion (OS X 10.7 [2]), but was also available to paying > developers for Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6). > > Consequently, I think it's safe to say that getdelim() is available > for Lion (10.7) and later. If we don't mind being a bit less > conservative, then we might assume that it also is available for Snow > Leopard (10.6), which it definitely supported, but perhaps that's too > risky, since not everyone would have been a paid subscriber.
Thanks for digging. I'd argue for the conservative choice, simply because this is a pure optimization. The old code should work just fine, and people have been living with it for years.
I doubt it will affect many people either way, though. Lion is 4 years old, and most OS X people seem to upgrade fairly regularly. It is not like long-term server systems where we are supporting Solaris 7. :)
Want to roll a patch?
> Alternately, we could make the test more dynamic and accurate by > grepping stdio.h for 'getdelim' or just by trying a test compile, > though that's probably too expensive.
The natural place would be in configure.ac, and that is orthogonal to the default Darwin setting, I think.
-Peff