Re: [BUG] Performance regression due to #33d4221: write_sha1_file: freshen existing objects
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2015, 20:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150420200956.GA16249@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1tjelg78.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:04:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > ... But I don't know > > if this counts as critical (it is for you, certainly, but I don't think > > that many people are affected, as the crucial factor here is really the > > slow NFS filesystem operations). > > If it is critical to some people, they can downmerge to their custom > old installations of Git they maintain with ease, of course, and > that "with ease" part is the reason why I try to apply fixes to tip > of the original topic branch even though they were merged to the > mainline eons ago ;-).
I think it is a bigger deal for folks who do not ship a custom installation, but expect to ship a third-party system that interacts with whatever version of git their customers happen to have (in which case they can only recommend their customers to upgrade).
I don't know how Stash or GitLab installations work. GitHub ships our own custom git (which I maintain), though we are already on 2.3.x.
Either way, though, I do not think it is the upstream Git project's problem.
-Peff