Re: git bundle vs git rev-list
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2014, 23:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20141205231350.GB223328@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAL3By--xYnXFUdDP3MDxAxvfeBT3ArFrdAV=apzdWg6_kiD2Yg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:36:18PM -0700, Jesse Hopkins wrote:
> 1. Any thoughts on why a tag would be included by 'git bundle', when > 'git rev-list' with the same arguments returns empty?
I think the answer to this is found in the git rev-list manpage:
List commits that are reachable by following the parent links from the given commit(s), but exclude commits that are reachable from the one(s) given with a ^ in front of them.
The operative word here is "commits". A bundle might include one or more tag objects, or unannotated tags, even though no new commits were available within the time frame.
-- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187