git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: 2.2.0-rc behavior changes (1/2)

From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date
Nov 10, 2014, 09:22 UTC
Message-ID
<20141110092219.GA11387@peff.net>
In-Reply-To
<CAGyf7-GxJ6XHjKqwktKqpo_mFuC_D3gzeOGNTdt4sweAnFqNRg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:47:32PM +1100, Bryan Turner wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> First change: git update-ref -d /refs/heads/nonexistent
> <some-valid-sha1> now produces an error about ref locking that it
> didn't produce before
> 
> Git 2.1.x and prior produced this output:
> error: unable to resolve reference refs/heads/nonexistent: No such
> file or directory
> 
> Now, in the 2.2.0 RCs, it says:
> error: unable to resolve reference refs/heads/nonexistent: No such
> file or directory
> error: Cannot lock the ref 'refs/heads/nonexistent'.
> 
> This one feels more like a bug, but again may not be. I say it feels
> like a bug because of the order of the messages: If git has decided
> the ref doesn't exist, why is it still trying to lock it?

I don't think this is a bug. The order you see is because the code goes something like this:

  1. the parent function calls a sub-function to lock
  2. the sub-function generates the error "no such file or directory"
     and returns failure to the caller
  3. the caller reports that acquiring the lock failed

The only thing that has changed between the two is step (3), but it is not an extra lock action after the error. It is just a more verbose report of the same error.

That being said, the sub-function (lock_ref_sha1_basic) gives a much more useful message. So it would be a nice enhancement to make sure that it prints something useful in every return case, and then drop the message from the caller.

As an aside, I'm also slightly confused by your output. Are you feeding "/refs/heads/nonexistent" (with a leading slash), or "refs/heads/nonexistent" (no leading slash)? If the latter, then that should silently succeed (and seems to in my tests). If the former, then the real problem is not ENOENT, but rather EINVAL; that name is not a valid refname.

Older versions of git would produce:
  error: unable to resolve reference /refs/heads/nonexistent: No such file or directory

which is like the error you showed, but note that the refname is reported with the leading slash. In v2.2.0-rc1, this is:

  error: unable to resolve reference /refs/heads/nonexistent: Invalid argument
  error: Cannot lock the ref '/refs/heads/nonexistent'.

which is more accurate. I could explain the differences in our output from some simple transcription errors when writing your email, but I wanted to make sure I am not missing something.

-Peff
Previous: Bryan TurnerNext: Bryan Turner
Message 2 of 3 in “2.2.0-rc behavior changes (1/2)”
  1. Bryan TurnerNov 10, 2014
  2. Jeff KingNov 10, 2014
  3. Bryan TurnerNov 10, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.