git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Regression and failure to clone/fetch with new code Re: git-svn performance

From
EWEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Date
Oct 30, 2014, 00:28 UTC
Message-ID
<20141030002801.GB31920@dcvr.yhbt.net>
In-Reply-To
<1414627570.41692.YahooMailBasic@web172306.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Argh, sorry. I thought I included the info but I didn't.
Thanks. I'll try a different version of svn later.
> What do you think were missing in my e-mails?
I was skimming and missed the part about Debian packages :)
Previous: Hin-Tak LeungNext: Hin-Tak Leung
Message 11 of 14 in “Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance”
  1. Hin-Tak LeungOct 27, 2014
  2. differences between old clone and new Re: git-svn performanceHin-Tak Leung, Oct 28, 2014
  3. Eric WongOct 28, 2014
  4. Hin-Tak LeungOct 28, 2014
  5. Eric WongOct 30, 2014
  6. Hin-Tak LeungOct 30, 2014
  7. Eric WongOct 30, 2014
  8. Regression and failure to clone/fetch with new code Re: git-svn performanceHin-Tak Leung, Oct 28, 2014
  9. Eric WongOct 29, 2014
  10. Hin-Tak LeungOct 30, 2014
  11. Eric WongOct 30, 2014
  12. Hin-Tak LeungOct 30, 2014
  13. Eric WongOct 30, 2014
  14. Eric WongOct 28, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.