Re: cherry picking and merge
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2014, 22:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140801224227.GU12427@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <05976673-8F8A-41FE-81C3-606CAA45BC52@comcast.net>
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It isn't, and that's deliberate > > Deliberate bugs are still bugs.
Yes, you and I disagree about what the behavior should be.
I actively prefer the current behavior over the one you proposed, unless I'm misunderstanding the one you proposed. As I understand it, there would be no way to undo the mistake of cherry-picking a change that didn't belong on "maint".
You said that 3-way merge doesn't fit your idea of what a merge is. It does fit mine.
I'm even slightly against there being an option for the 'git cherry' based thing. I think it would be a support burden. But if someone else wants to do the work of implementing it, I wouldn't stop them (and would instead just help make sure the documentation is crystal clear).
Hoping that clarifies, Jonathan