egit vs. git behaviour (was: [RFC/WIP] Pluggable reference backends)
- From
Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2014, 10:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140312102601.GA26257@inner.h.apk.li>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJo=hJt6zoJ=53JNUT6fLXM+5_4Af8enE67z3Ozv4DOz1jU1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:39:00 +0000, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> Yes, this was my real concern. Eclipse users using EGit expect EGit to > be compatible with git-core at the filesystem level so they can do > something in EGit then switch to a shell and bang out a command, or > run a script provided by their project or co-worker.
A question: Where to ask/report problems with that?
We're currently running into problems that egit doesn't push to where git would when the local and remote branches aren't the same name. It seems that egit ignores the branch.*.merge settings. Or push.default?
Andreas
-- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800