git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: `git stash pop` UX Problem

From
DRDamien Robert <damien.olivier.robert@gmail.com>
Date
Feb 27, 2014, 11:23 UTC
Message-ID
<20140227112317.GC1215@feanor>
Matthieu Moy  wrote in message <vpqzjlf5q2z.fsf@anie.imag.fr>:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Maybe status should display a stash count if that count is > 0, as
>> this is part of the state of the repo.
> Maybe it would help some users, but not me for example. My main use of
> "git stash" is a safe replacement for "git reset --hard": when I want to
> discard changes, but keep them safe just in case.
> So, my stash count is almost always >0, and I don't want to hear about
> it.
Related to your comment, I adapted git-stash
  https://gist.github.com/DamienRobert/9227034
to have the following (mis)features:
- There is a global --ref option that allows to specify the reference the
  stash will use (by default this is refs/mystash, git-stash.sh uses
  refs/stash).
  This allows to differenciate between different uses of stashes: save WIP
  before switching branch; keep a backup before a git reset;...
- There is a new command `git mystash dosave` that works like git stash but
  does not reset the worktree afterwards. Note that `git stash create`
  already does that, but it handles options differently than `git stash
  save`. `git mystash dosave` can be seen as a wrapper around `git stash
  create`.
  The reason is that while `git stash create` is intended for scripts, `git
  mystash dosave` is intended for the UI. One example of when we don't want
  to drop the worktree is when we want to do a `git checkout -m -- paths`
  but we want to save the current state in case the merge has conflicts.
- `git stash branch` pops the stash once the branch is created. I did not
  like this feature so `git mystash branch` does not pop the stash; use `git
  mystash popbranch` to have the original meaning of `git stash branch`.
- `git mystash save` (and `git stash dosave`) has a new option
  `--on-branch` which stores the stash onto the current branch rather than
  in $ref_stash. The idea is that when I use `git stash` for a WIP, then
  when I come back to the original branch I always forget that I had a
  stash for this branch, and if there were several WIP in between it can be
  hard to remember which stash to apply. With `--on-branch`, when I come
  back to the original branch I am now on the stash, and I know I just need
  to apply it. For that `git mystash apply` (or `git mystash pop`) also has
  a `--on-branch` option that tells it to use the stash on the current
  branch.
- `git mystash info` gives informations about a stash.

So obviously not all of these would be good for inclusion into git, but maybe some of them would be somewhat worth it. When I have the time I'll try to write tests and send proper patches.

-- 
Damien Robert
Message 1 of 1 in “Re: `git stash pop` UX Problem”
  1. Damien RobertFeb 27, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.