Re: [PATCH] Ensure __BYTE_ORDER is always set
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2014, 22:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140130224817.GB30478@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140130221205.GI27577@google.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:12:05PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Jeff King wrote: > > > I do find the failure mode interesting. The endian-swapping code kicked > > in when it did not > > Odd --- wouldn't the #if condition expand to '0 != 0'?
I had the same thought. The "kicked in when it did not" is Brian's claim from the original, which is why I was confused. He replied to me off-list, and I think he may simply have had it backwards. :)
-Peff