Re: git-log --cherry-pick gives different results when using tag or tag^{}
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 15, 2014, 09:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140115094945.GD14335@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <52CFF27C.1090108@gmail.com>
[+cc Junio, as the bug blames to him]
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> In mykernel repository, I'm having 2 different behaviours with git-log
> but I don't understand why:
>
> Doing:
>
> $ git log --oneline --cherry-pick --left-right v3.4.71-1^{}...next
>
> and
>
> $ git log --oneline --cherry-pick --left-right v3.4.71-1...next
>
> give something different (where v3.4.71-1 is a tag).
>
> The command using ^{} looks the one that gives correct result I think.Yeah, this looks like a bug. Here's a simple reproduction recipe:
commit() {
echo content >$1 &&
git add $1 &&
git commit -m $1
}git init repo && cd repo && commit one && commit two && sleep 1 && git tag -m foo mytag && git checkout -b side HEAD^ && git cherry-pick mytag && commit three
The sleep seems to be necessary, to give the commit and its cherry-picked version different commit times (presumably because it impacts the order in which we visit them during the traversal).
Running:
git log --oneline --decorate --cherry-pick --left-right mytag^{}...HEADproduces the expected:
> e36cc32 (HEAD, side) three
but running it with the tag, as:
git log --oneline --decorate --cherry-pick --left-right mytag...HEAD
yields:
> e36cc32 (HEAD, side) three > 5e96f7d two > db92fca (tag: mytag, master) two
Not only do we get the cherry-pick wrong (we should omit both "twos"), but we seem to erroneously count the tagged "two" as being on the right-hand side, which it clearly is not (and which is probably why we don't find the match via --cherry-pick).
This worked in v1.8.4, but is broken in v1.8.5. It bisects to Junio's 895c5ba (revision: do not peel tags used in range notation, 2013-09-19), which sounds promising.
I think what is happening is that we used to apply the SYMMETRIC_LEFT flag directly to the commit. Now we apply it to the tag, and it does not seem to get propagated. The patch below fixes it for me, but I have no idea if we actually need to be setting the other flags, or just SYMMETRIC_LEFT. I also wonder if the non-symmetric two-dot case needs to access any pointed-to commit and propagate flags in a similar way.
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c index 7010aff..1d99bfc 100644 --- a/revision.c +++ b/revision.c @@ -1197,6 +1197,8 @@ int handle_revision_arg(const char *arg_, struct rev_info *revs, int flags, unsi free_commit_list(exclude); a_flags = flags | SYMMETRIC_LEFT; + a->object.flags |= a_flags; + b->object.flags |= flags; } a_obj->flags |= a_flags; -Peff