Re: [PATCH v4] remote-curl: fix large pushes with GSSAPI
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2013, 06:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20131031063451.GA5513@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131030224030.GC12595@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:40:30PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> If you would split it out, that would be great. Then I'll simply rebase > my patch on top of yours and go from there.
I just included your patch on top, since it was the residue left over after committing my refactoring. Please read over the result to make sure I am not defaming you. :)
I noticed while committing the first patch that we do not actually follow the "do not look at curl after finish_active_slot" rule for the content-type. Again, we get away with it because we are not running multiple slots at the time (we only check content-type during the initial discovery).
I think the refactoring here is the cleanest thing by the existing rules, but I also think we could get away with the somewhat simpler patch of just teaching probe_rpc to grab the AUTHAVAIL (because it still has the old slot and does not need to call get_active_slot again, and because we know we are only using a single slot).
Going through all of this, I can't help but be annoyed at how much http baggage we are carrying around for the curl_multi code for parallel fetches, which is only used for dumb http. The smart-http code would be happy with a single curl handle we used each time. But I imagine there are still people relying on dumb http, and dropping the parallel fetch would be a pretty severe regression for them.
[1/3]: http: return curl's AUTHAVAIL via slot_results [2/3]: remote-curl: pass curl slot_results back through run_slot [3/3]: remote-curl: fix large pushes with GSSAPI
-Peff