Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2013, #06; Tue, 27)

From: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Date: Aug 28, 2013, 00:05 UTC
Message-ID: <20130828000548.GA5238@camk.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsixvaqh5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:22:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> * kk/tests-with-no-perl (2013-08-24) 4 commits
>  - reset test: modernize style
>  - t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh: Add PERL prerequisite
>  - add -i test: use skip_all instead of repeated PERL prerequisite
>  - Make test "using invalid commit with -C" more strict

>  Am I waiting for another reroll?

>From these four commits only the second and last one are from me and I'm

happy with their form as in pu (I see that you have already introduced your improvement of "commit --allow-empty" to the last one). Unless there are some remarks to them.

But I don't know what about Jonathan's commits.

As a matter of fact I have no idea how I even should reroll the topic that includes commits with mixed authorship.

-- 
  Kacper