Re: [PATCH 7/7] push: document --lockref
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 14, 2013, 20:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130714203403.GE8564@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <51E3084D.2040504@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Sorry, IMO, this goes into a totally wrong direction, in particular, I > think that this is going to close to door to make --lockref the default > some day in a way that helps everyone.
Would a '*' that acts like --lockref on a per ref basis address your concerns?
I realize that that design would hurt a project of making '+' use lockref automatically some day. I think that's ok, and that '+' meaning "push whatever I have, regardless of what's on the other end, and I mean it" would be better semantics in the long term (which doesn't match the current behavior either :/).
Jonathan