Re: --follow is ignored when used with --reverse
- From
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2013, 09:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130702091936.GA9161@serenity.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130524012324.295dec77@hugo.daonet.home>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:23:24AM +0200, Alois Mahdal wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hello! > > This [has been reported][1] to this list about half a year ago > but with no response so I'm not even sure if it's been > acknowledged as bug. > > [1]: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=135215709307126&q=raw > > When I use `git log --follow file` all is OK, but once I add > `--reverse` to it, it no longer follows the file beyond renames. > > This makes it hard to query for when the file was really added, > which I was trying to achieve with > > $ git -1 --reverse --follow several_times_renamed_file
In my testing it actually seems to be worse than that. In git.git:
$ git log --oneline builtin/clone.c | wc -l
99
$ git log --oneline --reverse builtin/clone.c | wc -l
99
$ git log --oneline --follow builtin/clone.c | wc -l
125
$ git log --oneline --follow --reverse builtin/clone.c | wc -l
3So the combination of --reverse and --follow appears to have lost the majority of the commits!