Re: git stash deletes/drops changes of
- From
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
- Date
- May 24, 2013, 15:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130524153853.GE27005@serenity.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <loom.20130524T173321-264@post.gmane.org>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:34:26PM +0000, Jim Greenleaf wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Phil Hord <phil.hord <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > The wording of --ignore-changes suffers the same lack of clarity that > > --assume-unchanged does. > > What's better? --sequester is probably too obscure. Maybe --hold. > > Or --silence. Or --shut-up. > > How about --freeze?
I wonder if this would be better as a file rather than another option to git-update-index. We already have .git/info/exclude so we could add .git/info/freeze or .git/info/local with the same syntax as the normal .gitignore file.