Re: feature suggestion: improve rerere
- From
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2013, 14:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130306144225.GB15375@pengutronix.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <51374382.6050101@viscovery.net>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 37 quoted lines
> Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > ++<<<<<<< ours
> > +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + ssize_t ret, done = 0;
> > +
> > +retry:
> > + ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + done += ret;
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
> > + return done;
> > + else
> > + goto retry;
> > +}
> > +
> > ++||||||| base
> > ++=======
> > + #include "common.h"
> > +
> > ++>>>>>>> theirs
> > int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> > {
> > int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
> >
> > This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
> > exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
> > recorded for the first conflict here.
> >
> > Sounds sensible?
>
> Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
> conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
> ||||| line.I only did git checkout --conflict=diff3 after the merge conflict happend. So I cannot confirm that git already does it.
So here is a reproduction receipe:
git clone git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git
cd mtd-utils
git checkout ca39eb1
wget -O patch1 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45779/raw
wget -O patch2 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45591/raw
for p in patch1 patch2; do perl -p -i -e 'print "From tralala Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001\n" if $. == 1' $p; done
git am patch1
git am -3 patch2 # first merge conflict
perl -n -i -e 's/=======//; print unless /^[<>]{7} /;' flash_otp_write.c # resolve
git add flash_otp_write.c
git am --resolved
git rebase -i ca39eb1 # swap order of the two patchesresults in
$ git ls-files -u 100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 1 flash_otp_write.c 100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 2 flash_otp_write.c 100644 31b963e2d6cf0016ca542529886e1ee71a22664e 3 flash_otp_write.c
and resolving yields:
$ git ls-files -s flash_otp_write.c 100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 0 flash_otp_write.c
Then git rebase --continue
gives the 2nd rebase conflict:
$ git ls-files -u 100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 1 flash_otp_write.c 100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 2 flash_otp_write.c 100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 3 flash_otp_write.c
Now knowing from the previous resolution that with base=f360a3e0 (= origin + patch1) merging
d407ebbf (= origin) and 31b963e2 (= origin + patch1 + patch2)
gives 648e0422 (origin + patch2), git could know that with base=d407ebbf (origin) merging 648e0422 (origin + patch1) and f360a3e0 (origin + patch1) gives 31b963e2 (origin + patch1 + patch2) again.
And git doesn't prepare 31b963e2 in flash_otp_write.c for me.
@Johannes, do you have some non-standard setting, or can you reproduce?
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |