Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] User manual updates

From: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Feb 19, 2013, 09:34 UTC
Message-ID: <20130219093429.GA4024@odin.tremily.us>
In-Reply-To: <20130218122750.GE8388@odin.tremily.us>

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:27:50AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:56:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I've taken the following to 'maint'…
> 
> Should I rebase v4 onto maint so I don't accidentally collide with any
> of the previous patches which have already been merged there?

I tried this, but the backtick patch shouldn't move to maint due to:

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:36:32PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:

> I based my changes on `master` to avoid colliding with 2de9b711
> (Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git',
> 2013-01-21), but if you shifted them already I suppose you've fixed
> any conflicts ;).

I'll drop it for now, and revive it after the next release syncs master and maint. I've rebased the remaining patches onto `maint`.

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy