Re: [PATCH] Verify Content-Type from smart HTTP servers

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > Is it worth having a strbuf_set* family of functions to match the
> > strbuf_add*? We seem to have these sorts of errors with strbuf from time
> > to time, and I wonder if that would make it easier (and more readable)
> > to do the right thing.
> 
> Possibly.
> 
> The callsite below may be a poor example, though; you would need the
> _reset() even if you change the _addstr() we can see in the context
> to _setstr() to make sure later strbuf_*(type) will start from a
> clean slate when !t anyway, no?