Re: [PATCH 6/5] t9001: check send-email behavior with implicit sender

From

Jeff King <peff@peff.net>

Date

Nov 28, 2012, 20:17 UTC

Message-ID

<20121128201713.GA9249@sigill.intra.peff.net>

In-Reply-To

<20121128200626.GA4292@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:06:26PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> Here's a cleaned up version that makes it more obvious the commands are
> the same (it also fixes a few minor whitespace problems on the
> indentation, which you can see from the quoting above).

diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index c5d66cf..9c8fac1 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -201,6 +201,30 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Prompting works' '
 		grep "^To: to@example.com\$" msgtxt1
 '
 
+test_expect_success $PREREQ 'handle implicit ident' '
+	clean_fake_sendmail &&
+	(
+		sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+		sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+		sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+		sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+		GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 && export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
+		{
+			git send-email \
+				--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
+				--to=to@example.com \
+				$patches </dev/null 2>errors;
+			exit_code=$?
+		} &&
+		if test_have_prereq AUTOIDENT; then
+			test $exit_code = 0
+		else
+			test $exit_code != 0 &&
+			test_i18ngrep "tell me who you are" errors
+		fi
+	)
+'
+
 test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocmd works' '
 	clean_fake_sendmail &&
 	cp $patches tocmd.patch &&

which does work, though it is less nice that the protections and nice
syntax of "test_must_fail" must be abandoned (unless we want to do
something horrible like 'test_must_fail sh -c "exit $exit_code"'.
I could go either way.

-Peff