Re: [PATCH] Third try at documenting command integration requirements.
- From
Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2012, 03:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121128033639.GC1669@thyrsus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobiijxol.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> I won't worry about Python 3 yet; in what timeframe did Python's > i18n/unicode support become usable? In 2.4, or 2.6?
Er, it depends on what you consider "usable".
Unicode integration turned out to have a lot messier edge cases than anyone understood going in. First-cut support was in 1.6, but I'd say it still has some pretty sharp edges *today*. Which is why 3.0 has gone all-Unicode-all-the-time. The problems mostly come from having two different notions of "string" that don't really mix well.
Me, I still avoid the hell out of Unicode in Python. And occasionally fund myself cursing a library maintainer who didn't.
-- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>